Skip to content
← Joining The Dots
Insights5 min read

Why AI adoption needs your leaders

In 2025, executives turned out to be the heaviest users of unsanctioned AI. Using it themselves, though, is not the same as leading it. Why adoption stalls without leaders, and what driving it actually takes.

There is a revealing finding buried in the 2025 research on AI at work. When the security firm UpGuard looked at who was using AI tools their business hadn't sanctioned, the heaviest users weren't the junior staff. They were the executives (UpGuard; more on that in Shadow AI).

That tells you something important. The problem with leadership and AI is rarely that leaders won't touch it. Plenty are using it enthusiastically in private. The problem is that using AI yourself is not the same as leading your organisation through adopting it, and the second is the part that tends to go missing.

Adoption follows the tone from the top

AI adoption stalls, more than anything, when leaders don't visibly drive it. People take their cues from what leadership actually does, not from what a policy says. If the executive team treats AI as a private curiosity, that is exactly how the organisation will treat it: optional, individual, and never quite part of how the business runs.

When leaders set a direction, talk about it openly, and back it with real attention, adoption gets permission to become serious. The same tool that languished as a personal experiment becomes the way the work is done. Very little else does as much for adoption as a leadership team that has plainly decided it matters.

The two things leaders are missing

Leaders stall AI adoption for one of two reasons, and usually it is a mix of both:

  • The technology feels foreign. Plenty of capable leaders don't feel confident enough in AI to lead a conversation about it, so they quietly avoid the topic and hope someone below them handles it.
  • The change leadership is hard. Even leaders who know the technology can underestimate what it takes to bring a whole team through a shift in how they work.

Neither is a flaw, and both are fixable. Sometimes the single highest-value thing we do with a business is spend an hour with the leadership team, not the technology, getting them comfortable enough to lead it out loud.

Lead it, don't delegate it

The instinct is often to hand AI to IT, or to a single enthusiast, and consider it covered. That is how adoption ends up owned by everyone and no one. AI touches strategy, people and risk across the whole business, which makes it a leadership responsibility, not a task to push downward.

You don't have to become the most technical person in the room. You have to be visibly behind it, clear about why it matters, and willing to go first. A team will follow a leader who has obviously decided this is the direction. They will quietly wait out one who hasn't.

If you want a clear read on where your leadership and your business stand on AI, the free AI Maturity Assessment is the place to start.

Want to know where your team actually stands?